Diversity of hemodynamic types in connective tissue disease associated pulmonary hypertension: more than a subgroup of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Objective Connective tissue disease associated pulmonary hypertension (CTD-PH) is classified as a subgroup of WHO group 1 PH, also called pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, not all CTD-PH fit hemodynamic definition of PAH. This study investigates the diversity of hemodynamic types of CT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC pulmonary medicine 2022-08, Vol.22 (1), p.1-295, Article 295
Hauptverfasser: Dong, Xingbei, Shi, Yue, Xia, Ying, Zhang, Xiao, Qian, Junyan, Zhao, Jiuliang, Peng, Jinmin, Wang, Qian, Weng, Li, Li, Mengtao, Du, Bin, Zeng, Xiaofeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Connective tissue disease associated pulmonary hypertension (CTD-PH) is classified as a subgroup of WHO group 1 PH, also called pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, not all CTD-PH fit hemodynamic definition of PAH. This study investigates the diversity of hemodynamic types of CTD-PH, their differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes. Method We performed a retrospective cohort study. CTD-PH patients were enrolled and divided into WHO group1 PH, WHO group 2 PH and hyperdynamic PH (mPAP > 20 mmHg, PVR < 3WU, PAWP < 15 mmHg) according to hemodynamics obtained by right heart catheterization. Patients with severe lung diseases, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, pulmonary embolism, and hepatic cirrhosis were excluded. Baseline characteristics, autoantibodies, cardiac function, echocardiogram parameters, hemodynamics and survival rates were compared. Result A total of 202 CTD-PH patients were included, 138 in WHO group 1 PH, 33 in WHO group 2 PH and 31 in hyperdynamic PH. We found hyperdynamic PH is less severe, presenting lower NT-proBNP level, better WHO function class, lower mPAP and PVR, higher cardiac output, and less cardiac remodeling. Incidence of anti-RNP was significantly lower in patients with elevated PAWP. Short-term survival was worse in WHO group 2 PH, yet 5-year survival rates didn't differ between groups. Conclusion Considering diversity in hemodynamic types, CTD-PH is more than a subgroup of PAH. Different types of CTD-PH present different clinical phenotypes and outcome. Phenotyping PH in CTD-PH patients is important. Keywords: Connective tissue disease, Pulmonary hypertension, Hemodynamics, PAWP, PVR, Prognosis
ISSN:1471-2466
1471-2466
DOI:10.1186/s12890-022-02081-0