Real-time monitoring of vitamin C levels in trauma patients by electron-spin resonance spectrometry

In critically ill patients, healthy vitamin C levels are important to avoid an imbalance in reactive oxygen species. To achieve this, oxidative stress levels in emergency patients need to be accurately measured in real-time. However, normally, reactive oxygen/nitrogen species are short-lived, render...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC emergency medicine 2023-08, Vol.23 (1), p.85-85, Article 85
Hauptverfasser: Takenaka, Ryuichi, Matsumoto, Shigekiyo, Nureki, Shinichi, Wada, Shinsuke, Oyama, Yoshimasa, Sakamoto, Teruo, Kitano, Takaaki, Shigemitsu, Osamu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In critically ill patients, healthy vitamin C levels are important to avoid an imbalance in reactive oxygen species. To achieve this, oxidative stress levels in emergency patients need to be accurately measured in real-time. However, normally, reactive oxygen/nitrogen species are short-lived, rendering measurement difficult; moreover, measurement of relatively stable antioxidants and other oxidative stress markers in real-time is challenging. Therefore, we used electron-spin resonance spectrometry (ESR) to assess vitamin C levels, clarify their relationship with patients' severity, and establish more effective vitamin C therapy in critically ill patients. We studied 103 severely ill emergency patients and 15 healthy volunteers. Vitamin C radical (VCR/dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) values were analyzed in arterial blood samples by ESR at admission and once daily thereafter during the acute recovery phase. Severity scores were calculated. The relationship between these scores and VCR/DMSO values and chronological changes in VCR/DMSO values were analyzed. Serum VCR/DMSO values were significantly lower in critically ill patients than in healthy volunteers (0.264 ± 0.014 vs. 0.935 ± 0.052, p 
ISSN:1471-227X
1471-227X
DOI:10.1186/s12873-023-00857-z