Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Pattern Electroretinogram Parameters

Background: Glaucoma is the most typical cause of permanent blindness. POAG, or primary open angle glaucoma, is the most common type. The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) has become a promising technique for detecting glaucoma early- on. The goal of this study was to assess the ability of PERG to di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) N.Z.), 2023-11, Vol.17, p.3281-3293
Hauptverfasser: Alhagaa, Ahmed A, Badawi, Nermeen Mahmoud, Morsy, Osama Abd Allah El
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Glaucoma is the most typical cause of permanent blindness. POAG, or primary open angle glaucoma, is the most common type. The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) has become a promising technique for detecting glaucoma early- on. The goal of this study was to assess the ability of PERG to diagnose POAG, especially in early, difficult-to-diagnose cases in comparison with other already established diagnostic methods. Methods: 150 participants (300 eyes) were enrolled in a cross-sectional study at ophthalmology department at Menoufia University Hospital in August 2022 to February 2023. All recruited participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmological and PERG exams. The studied eyes were divided into three groups as 100 normal eyes (Group I), 100 eyes with preperimetric glaucoma (Group II), and 100 eyes with established perimetric glaucoma (Group III). Results: OCT-RNFL average thickness had a significant positive correlation with P50 latency (r=0.289, p=0.041) or P50 amplitude (r=0.302, p=0.018) and N95 amplitude (r=0.640, p=0.001) among group (II). Also, RNFL thickness had negative correlation with P50 amplitude (r= -0.268, p=0.043) among group (III). RNFL thickness and P50 and N95 amplitude showed highest AUC values in detecting preperimetric glaucomatous eyes vs normal eyes (AUC=0.927, 0.952, 904), and for detecting established perimetric glaucomatous eyes vs normal eyes (AUC=1.00, 0.957, 0.983 respectively) compared with VF MD which showed AUC (0.458 and 0.901 respectively). Conclusion: Glaucoma patients exhibit PERG alterations (comparable to RNFL thickness changes) so, it could be used as an accurate diagnostic method in POAG. Because PERG alterations occur before visual field abnormalities, it could be relied on as an early diagnostic tool in preperimetric glaucoma. We can use both RNFL thickness assessment by OCT with PERG parameters as complementary tests for accurate diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma which represents the most difficult diagnostic challenge in glaucoma diagnosis. Keywords: pattern electroretinogram, preperimetric glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, RNFL thickness
ISSN:1177-5483
1177-5467
1177-5483
DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S424323