Contract-Based Scheduling of URLLC Packets in Incumbent EMBB Traffic

Recently, the coexistence of ultra-reliable and low-latency communication (URLLC) and enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) services on the same licensed spectrum has gained a lot of attention from both academia and industry. However, the coexistence of these services is not trivial due to the diverse mu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2020, Vol.8, p.167516-167526
Hauptverfasser: Manzoor, Aunas, Kazmi, S. M. Ahsan, Pandey, Shashi Raj, Hong, Choong Seon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recently, the coexistence of ultra-reliable and low-latency communication (URLLC) and enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) services on the same licensed spectrum has gained a lot of attention from both academia and industry. However, the coexistence of these services is not trivial due to the diverse multiple access protocols, contrasting frame distributions in the existing network, and the distinct quality of service requirements posed by these services. Therefore, such coexistence drives towards a challenging resource scheduling problem. To address this problem, in this paper, we first investigate the possibilities of scheduling URLLC packets in incumbent eMBB traffic. In this regard, we formulate an optimization problem for coexistence by dynamically adopting a superposition or puncturing scheme. In particular, the aim is to provide spectrum access to the URLLC users while reducing the intervention on incumbent eMBB users. Next, we apply the one-to-one matching game to find stable URLLC-eMBB pairs that can coexist on the same spectrum. Then, we apply the contract theory framework to design contracts for URLLC users to adopt the superposition scheme. Simulation results reveal that the proposed contract-based scheduling scheme achieves up to 63% of the eMBB rate for the "No URLLC" case compared to the "Puncturing" scheme.
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023128