A Soft-Reference Breast Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment Method That Considers the Local Lesion Area
The quality of breast ultrasound images has a significant impact on the accuracy of disease diagnosis. Existing image quality assessment (IQA) methods usually use pixel-level feature statistical methods or end-to-end deep learning methods, which focus on the global image quality but ignore the image...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioengineering (Basel) 2023-08, Vol.10 (8), p.940 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The quality of breast ultrasound images has a significant impact on the accuracy of disease diagnosis. Existing image quality assessment (IQA) methods usually use pixel-level feature statistical methods or end-to-end deep learning methods, which focus on the global image quality but ignore the image quality of the lesion region. However, in clinical practice, doctors’ evaluation of ultrasound image quality relies more on the local area of the lesion, which determines the diagnostic value of ultrasound images. In this study, a global–local integrated IQA framework for breast ultrasound images was proposed to learn doctors’ clinical evaluation standards. In this study, 1285 breast ultrasound images were collected and scored by experienced doctors. After being classified as either images with lesions or images without lesions, they were evaluated using soft-reference IQA or bilinear CNN IQA, respectively. Experiments showed that for ultrasound images with lesions, our proposed soft-reference IQA achieved PLCC 0.8418 with doctors’ annotation, while the existing end-to-end deep learning method that did not consider the local lesion features only achieved PLCC 0.6606. Due to the accuracy improvement for the images with lesions, our proposed global–local integrated IQA framework had better performance in the IQA task than the existing end-to-end deep learning method, with PLCC improving from 0.8306 to 0.8851. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2306-5354 2306-5354 |
DOI: | 10.3390/bioengineering10080940 |