PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KREDITOR DAN UPAYA NOTARIS MEMBUAT PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN SETELAH PERKAWINAN
One of the legal consequence of a marriage is a consolidation of husband and wife assets with the understanding that both parties before signing the marriage contract can decide otherwise, through the pre-nuptial contract. The Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XII/2015, made possible the maki...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veritas et justitia 2019-12, Vol.5 (2), p.464-491 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One of the legal consequence of a marriage is a consolidation of husband and wife assets with the understanding that both parties before signing the marriage contract can decide otherwise, through the pre-nuptial contract. The Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XII/2015, made possible the making of a similar arrangement after the marriage contract has been signed. The focus of this article is to explore, using a juridical normative approach, what legal protection exist for third parties. The main finding is that legal protection is provided by requiring the contract be made by and before a notary public, registered at the Civil Registrar Office and all that is performed only after the Notary Public made an inventory of both spouse’s assets. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2460-0555 2460-4488 |
DOI: | 10.25123/vej.3353 |