Study of factors affecting Small for Size Syndrome Post-Adult living donor liver transplantation

Recently, increasing evidence showed that small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a multifactorial disease which is precipitated by various perioperative factors other than graft size. We conducted the current work to evaluate perioperative effectors, which can increase the risk of SFSS following adult li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian journal of surgery 2021-02, Vol.44 (2), p.452-458
Hauptverfasser: Abdallah, Ahmed, Salman, Ahmed Abdallah, Sholkamy, Amany Abdelmaqsod, Salman, Mohamed Abdalla, Omar, Mahmoud Gouda, Youssef, Ahmed, Ameen, Mahmoud A., Abdel Dayem, Ahmad Yahia, El-Din Shaaban, Hossam, Youssef, Ossama Ramzy, Allah, Nesrin Abd, Abdelaty, Walid Rafat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recently, increasing evidence showed that small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a multifactorial disease which is precipitated by various perioperative factors other than graft size. We conducted the current work to evaluate perioperative effectors, which can increase the risk of SFSS following adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This is a retrospective study on 110 adult cirrhotic cases (mean age of 48.4 ± 6.9 years old) who underwent adult LDLT. Most cases were males (89%). Cases were categorized into two groups based on the occurrence of SFSS. The groups were compared regarding preoperative (gender, age, comorbidities, baseline investigations), intraoperative (mean blood pressure and glucose; mean operation time; number of packed red cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate units; time of cold and warm ischemia, and anhepatic phase; preclamping and post-reperfusion portal pressures), and postoperative factors (relevant investigations, hospital stay). Postoperatively, 23 patients developed SFSS (20.9%). SFSS group had significantly lower preoperative graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR) (0.76 ± 0.1% versus 1.03 ± 0.15, respectively; p 
ISSN:1015-9584
0219-3108
DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.10.016