Relationship of septal flash with electromechanical dyssynchrony and super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Objectives - to identify a relationship of septal flash (SF) with a super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), apical rocking (AR) and signs of left bundle brunch block (LBBB) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Material and methods. The study included 38 patients (92.1%...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Наука и инновации в медицине 2020-06, Vol.5 (2), p.93-98
Hauptverfasser: Shirokov, Nikita E., Kuznetsov, Vadim A., Malishevskii, Lev M., Todosiichuk, Viktor V., Soldatova, Anna M., Krinochkin, Dmitii V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives - to identify a relationship of septal flash (SF) with a super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), apical rocking (AR) and signs of left bundle brunch block (LBBB) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Material and methods. The study included 38 patients (92.1% men; mean age 54.3±9.4 years) with II-IV NYHA functional class CHF. Left bundle brunch block (LBBB) was diagnosed according to 3 criteria: American Heart Association (AHA) 2009, European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2013, Strauss. Septal flash (SF, mechanical anomaly of interventricular septum (IVS) movement) is determined according to speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). The patients were divided into two groups: with SF (I group, n=8) and without SF (II group, n=30). Mean follow-up was 34.5 [13.8;55.3]. Results. At baseline the groups did not differ in main clinical characteristics including QRS. The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was higher in group I (33.1%±1.7 and 30.0%±4.0; p=0.044). Basal segment of IVS longitudinal strain (LS) delay by STE (258.0 [144.0;294.0] ms vs 323.5 [273.3;385.0] ms; р=0.024) and LS delay by TDI (176.0 [146.8;287.3] ms vs 415.5 [315.8;493.5] ms; р30%); 53.1% of patients in group II were super responders (р
ISSN:2500-1388
2618-754X
DOI:10.35693/2500-1388-2020-5-2-93-98