A student trained convolutional neural network competing with a commercial AI software and experts in organ at risk segmentation

This retrospective, multi-centered study aimed to improve high-quality radiation treatment (RT) planning workflows by training and testing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to perform auto segmentations of organs at risk (OAR) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients, specifically the bladder and rectu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2024-10, Vol.14 (1), p.25929-8, Article 25929
Hauptverfasser: Bürkle, Sophia L., Kuhn, Dejan, Fechter, Tobias, Radicioni, Gianluca, Hartong, Nanna, Freitag, Martin T., Qiu, Xuefeng, Karagiannis, Efstratios, Grosu, Anca-Ligia, Baltas, Dimos, Zamboglou, Constantinos, Spohn, Simon K. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This retrospective, multi-centered study aimed to improve high-quality radiation treatment (RT) planning workflows by training and testing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to perform auto segmentations of organs at risk (OAR) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients, specifically the bladder and rectum. The objective of this project was to develop a clinically applicable and robust artificial intelligence (AI) system to assist radiation oncologists in OAR segmentation. The CNN was trained using manual contours in CT-datasets from diagnostic 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CTs by a student, then validated (n = 30, PET/CTs) and tested (n = 16, planning CTs). Further segmentations were generated by a commercial artificial intelligence (cAI) software. The ground truth were manual contours from expert radiation oncologists. The performance was evaluated using the Dice-Sørensen Coefficient (DSC), visual analysis and a Turing test. The CNN yielded excellent results in both cohorts and OARs with a DSC median  > 0.87, the cAI resulted in a DSC > 0.78. In the visual assessment, 67% (bladder) and 75% (rectum) of the segmentations were rated as acceptable for treatment planning. With a misclassification rate of 45.5% (bladder) and 51.1% (rectum), the CNN passed the Turing test. The metrics, visual assessment and the Turing test confirmed the clinical applicability and therefore the support in clinical routine.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-76288-y