Clinical assessment instruments validated for nursing practice in the Italian context: a systematic review of the literature
With the aim to identify the instruments validated for Italian nursing practice, a systematic review of the literature was undertaken. A total of 101 instruments emerged. The majority (89; 88.1%) were developed in other countries; the remaining (14; 13.9%) were developed and validated in the Italian...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita 2014-01, Vol.50 (1), p.67-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | With the aim to identify the instruments validated for Italian nursing practice, a systematic review of the literature was undertaken.
A total of 101 instruments emerged. The majority (89; 88.1%) were developed in other countries; the remaining (14; 13.9%) were developed and validated in the Italian context. The instruments were developed to measure patient's problems (63/101; 62.4%), outcomes (27/101; 26.7%), risks (4/101; 4%) and others issues (7/101; 6.9%). The majority of participants involved in the validation processes were younger adults (49; 48.5%), older adults (40; 39.5%), children (4; 4%), adolescents (3; 3%), and children/adolescents (1; 1%). The instruments were structured primarily in the form of questionnaires (61; 60.4%), as a grid for direct observation (27; 26.7%) or in other forms (12; 11.9%). Among the 101 instruments emerged, there were 1 to 7 validation measures documented with on average 3.2 (95% CI 2.86-3.54) for each instrument.
Developing validation studies giving priority to those instruments widely adopted in the clinical nursing practice is recommended. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-2571 2384-8553 |
DOI: | 10.4415/ANN_14_01_11 |