Exposure of agricultural workers in California to wildfire smoke under past and future climate conditions
Wildfire activity in the western U.S. has increased in frequency and severity in recent decades. Wildfire smoke emissions contribute to elevated fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) concentrations that are dangerous to public health. Due to the outdoor and physically demanding nature of their work, agr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research letters 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.94045 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Wildfire activity in the western U.S. has increased in frequency and severity in recent decades. Wildfire smoke emissions contribute to elevated fine particulate matter (PM
2.5
) concentrations that are dangerous to public health. Due to the outdoor and physically demanding nature of their work, agricultural workers are particularly vulnerable to wildfire smoke pollution. In this study, we quantify the potential exposure of agricultural workers in California to past (2004–2009) and future (2046–2051) smoke PM
2.5
. We find that while absolute increases in smoke PM
2.5
exposure are largest in northern California, agricultural regions in the Central Valley and Central Coast may be highly vulnerable to future increases in smoke PM
2.5
concentrations. We find an increase from 6 to 8 million worker smoke exposure days (+35%) of ‘smokewave’ exposure for agricultural workers across the state under future climate conditions, with the largest increases in Tulare, Monterey, and Fresno counties. Under future climate conditions, we find 1.9 million worker smoke exposure days of agricultural worker exposure to levels of total PM
2.5
pollution deemed ‘Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups.’ This is a 190% increase over past climate conditions. Wildfire smoke PM
2.5
contributes, on average, to more than 90% of these daily PM
2.5
exceedances compared with non-fire sources of air pollution. Using the recent extreme wildfire season of 2020 as a case study, we show that existing monitoring networks do not provide adequate sampling of PM
2.5
in many future at-risk wildfire regions with large numbers of agricultural workers. Policies will need to consider the changing patterns of smoke PM
2.5
exposure under future climate conditions to better protect outdoor agricultural workers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1748-9326 1748-9326 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8c58 |