Distribution of the Most Prevalent Spa Types among Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant and -Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus around the World: A Review
, a leading cause of community-acquired and nosocomial infections, remains a major health problem worldwide. Molecular typing methods, such as typing, are vital for the control and, when typing can be made more timely, prevention of spread around healthcare settings. The current study aims to review...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in microbiology 2018-02, Vol.9, p.163-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | , a leading cause of community-acquired and nosocomial infections, remains a major health problem worldwide. Molecular typing methods, such as
typing, are vital for the control and, when typing can be made more timely, prevention of
spread around healthcare settings. The current study aims to review the literature to report the most common clinical
types around the world, which is important for epidemiological surveys and nosocomial infection control policies.
A search via PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Scopus was conducted for original articles reporting the most prevalent
types among
isolates. The search terms were "
."
The most prevalent
types were t032, t008 and t002 in Europe; t037 and t002 in Asia; t008, t002, and t242 in America; t037, t084, and t064 in Africa; and t020 in Australia. In Europe, all the isolates related to
type t032 were MRSA. In addition,
type t037 in Africa and t037and t437 in Australia also consisted exclusively of MRSA isolates. Given the fact that more than 95% of the papers we studied originated in the past decade there was no option to study the dynamics of regional clone emergence.
This review documents the presence of the most prevalent
types in countries, continents and worldwide and shows big local differences in clonal distribution. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1664-302X 1664-302X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00163 |