The Evaluation of Ten Narrations in the Proverb Story of “Afforesting for Others”

Pahlavi and Persian language and its educational aspects in translation movement of texts to Arabic in the Umayyad period are some of the main references for translators. Wisdom and Iranian moral educations were translated into Arabic and then Persian retranslations of them were reproduced in Iranian references and have reached our period through intertextuality. In this transfer, each writer according to his/her style has added something to it, which has shown the author’s ideology and discourse. Narratology, which is in fact the study of grammar in narration, uses linguistics as a model to study the narration in a genre and move from form to meaning. It considers the narration discourse as "Parol" or distinct representation of "Lunge" systems of the story, retrieves the main categories of language (person, time, mode, aspect) in the story, and tries to find the common dominant system in all story narratives. This essay by using library references and the descriptive-analytic method provides the comparative narration analysis of the story “The Others Planted, We Eat, We Plant, and Others Will Eat” by Ragheb Isfahani to Bahar. Findings show that the topics of most sources are the same but have different concepts and plots. In these stories, some concepts were proposed and made such differences in the discourse as the difference of relationship between king and vassal, Iranian or Arabic orientations, vassal wisdom and showing the ignorance and incompetency of kings toward people, the dominance of kings, the purposes of rewards and its degree and link to the governmental chamber, and tax.