Catalytic performance of Na/Ca-based fluxes for coal char gasification

Flux, able to improve the ash fusibility, usually contains catalytic metal compounds. Unfortunately, the quantitative analysis of synergistic catalysis effects between different fluxing agents on coal gasification has not been investigated thoroughly. In this study, the effect of the kinds and conte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Green processing and synthesis 2022-02, Vol.11 (1), p.204-217
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Tao, Mao, Lirui, Jiao, Facun, Wu, Chengli, Zheng, Mingdong, Li, Hanxu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Flux, able to improve the ash fusibility, usually contains catalytic metal compounds. Unfortunately, the quantitative analysis of synergistic catalysis effects between different fluxing agents on coal gasification has not been investigated thoroughly. In this study, the effect of the kinds and content of Na/Ca-based fluxes on char gasification was investigated in thermogravimetry analyzer (TGA). The synergistic catalysis effects and mechanism between the two kinds of fluxes were also studied. Finally, based on the TGA tests, the kinetics models for char gasification with flux addition were developed. The results showed that all the four Na-based fluxes could increase the char reactivity. Na CO , which afforded the best activity, could increase the reactivity by 5.3 times when the content was 5%. The five Ca-based fluxes had a weaker catalysis effect compared with Na-based fluxes. CaCl , exhibiting the best activity among the five Ca-based fluxes, could increase the reactivity by 2.3 times when the content was 5%. For composite fluxes, Na CO –CaO and Na CO –CaCO had a remarkable synergistic effect, whereas others had less effect. Na CO could inhibit the aggregation of Ca, which might cause the synergistic effects between Na and Ca fluxes. The random pore model was more suitable to describe the catalytic gasification process.
ISSN:2191-9550
2191-9542
2191-9550
DOI:10.1515/gps-2022-0020