Comparison of Vinorelbine-Cisplatin with Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Sevket Özkaya1, Serhat Findik2, Oguz Uzun2, Atilla Guven Atici3 and Levent Erkan 4 1Specialist, 2Associate Professor, 3Assistant Professor, 4Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine Faculty of Medicine Ondokuz Mayis University SAMSUN/TURKEY. Abstract Purpose: The objective of this trial was to co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical medicine circulatory, respiratory, and pulmonary medicine respiratory, and pulmonary medicine, 2008-01, Vol.2008 (2), p.27
Hauptverfasser: Ozkaya, Sevket, Findik, Serhat, Uzun, Oguz, Atici, Atilla Guven, Erkan, Levent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sevket Özkaya1, Serhat Findik2, Oguz Uzun2, Atilla Guven Atici3 and Levent Erkan 4 1Specialist, 2Associate Professor, 3Assistant Professor, 4Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine Faculty of Medicine Ondokuz Mayis University SAMSUN/TURKEY. Abstract Purpose: The objective of this trial was to compare cisplatin-plus-vinorelbine regimen with cisplatin-plus-gemcitabine regimen in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received either vinoelbine 30 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) every 21 days (VC arm) or gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) every 21 days (GC arm). Results: One hundred thirty four patients (67 VC and 67 GC) were included to the study. Overall response rates for the VC arm (31.2%) were not significantly different from that of the GC arm (34.3%). There were no differences in overall survival and one-year survival rates. Median survival and one-year survival rates for the VC and GC groups were 10.6 and 11.5 months, 45% and 46.8%, respectively. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher on the GC arm (VC 1.4% v GC 8.9%, p 0.05), as was febrile neutropenia on the VC arm (VC 8.9% v GC 1.2%, p 0.05). Conclusion: VC and GC demonstrated similar efficacy but there were differences in toxicity profiles.
ISSN:1179-5484
1178-1157
1179-5484
1178-1157
DOI:10.4137/CCRPM.S578