Stress Analysis on Mesiolingual Cavity of Endodontically Treated Molar Restored Using Bidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Composite (Wallpapering Technique)

Endodontically treated teeth (ETT) undergo extensive structure change and experience high stress during biomechanical function. Stress distribution is influenced by the restoration material and the type of bond between material and tooth structure. The selection of materials that can distribute stress will affect the resistance and retention of ETT to mastication forces, thus biomechanical functions were achieved. Composite has mechanical properties similar to dentin, it can transmit and distribute stresses throughout the tooth surface. The disadvantage of composites in large cavities is their lack of toughness. The addition of fiber to composites can increase their toughness. This research is to determine the stress distribution of a fiber-reinforced composite made of polyethylene and e-glass on the mesiolingual cavity of ETT. A three-dimensional model of the mandibular molar was prepared for cavity preparation and the formation of restorations using SolidWorks 2021. The models were analyzed with Abaqus 2020 to determine stress concentrations after given vertical and oblique loading. The maximum and minimum principal stress data were obtained to assess material resistance and interfacial damage criterion. Polyethylene fiber shows a more homogeneous stress distribution because the modulus of elasticity is close to the dentin and has a thickness that can reduce the volume of the composite. The E-glass shows the stress concentration on the circumferential fiber and cavity floor. The stress distribution of fiber-reinforced composite on the buccolingual cavity of ETT using the finite element method did not show structural failure in the polyethylene group because the maximum and minimum principal stresses were lower than the strength of the material. Interfacial bond failure occurs at the enamel portion. The maximum and minimum principal values of e-glass indicate structural failure in the circumferential fiber and the base fiber because the stress exceeds the strength of the material. Interfacial bond failure occurred on the circumferential and the cavity floor.