Comparison of clinical outcomes between tailored transvaginal mesh surgery and native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse

Comparison of clinical outcomes between tailored transvaginal mesh surgery and native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse

The most suitable surgical technique for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of the tailored transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery and vaginal native tissue repair (NTR) surgery for POP. Between November 2011 and August 2014, medical rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 2019-12, Vol.118 (12), p.1623-1632
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Ting-Chen, Hsiao, Sheng-Mou, Wu, Pei-Chi, Chen, Chi-Hau, Wu, Wen-Yih, Lin, Ho-Hsiung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Aged
Cystocele
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Pelvic organ prolapse
Pelvic Organ Prolapse - physiopathology
Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Surgical Mesh
Taiwan
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence - etiology
Urinary Incontinence - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The most suitable surgical technique for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of the tailored transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery and vaginal native tissue repair (NTR) surgery for POP. Between November 2011 and August 2014, medical records of 339 women receiving POP surgeries were reviewed. Compared with the NTR group (n = 169), the use of TVM surgery (n = 170) was a predictor for longer operation time (coefficient = 25.2 min, P 
ISSN:0929-6646
1876-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2019.08.034