Comment on ‘Targeted Ciphers for Format‐Preserving Encryption’ from Selected Areas in Cryptography 2018

Format‐preserving encryption (FPE) allows encrypting plaintexts while preserving a specific format. In Selected Areas in Cryptography 2018, two targeted ciphers were proposed as new FPE schemes. The second scheme was designed with an algorithm called Mix–Swap–Unmix that is shown to be equivalent to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IET information security 2021-09, Vol.15 (5), p.395-400
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Dachao, Wang, Baocang, Ping, Yuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Format‐preserving encryption (FPE) allows encrypting plaintexts while preserving a specific format. In Selected Areas in Cryptography 2018, two targeted ciphers were proposed as new FPE schemes. The second scheme was designed with an algorithm called Mix–Swap–Unmix that is shown to be equivalent to a particular matching exchange process under a specific setting. In this comment paper, we prove that the matching exchange process is invalid. As a result, this equivalence does not exist.
ISSN:1751-8709
1751-8717
DOI:10.1049/ise2.12028