Culture of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone, 1931) with zero water exchange and no food addition: an eco-friendly approach/Cultivo de camaron blanco (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone, 1931) sin recambio de agua y sin adicion de alimento formulado: un sistema amigable con el ambiente
Juveniles (3.5 [+ or -] 0.3 g) of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei were grown during 40 days with no water exchanges, no food addition and four initial densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 g [m.sup.-3], corresponding to between 8 and 32 shrimp [m.sup.-2]), to determine growth rates, which could be ach...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Latin american journal of aquatic research 2012-07, Vol.40 (2), p.441-447 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Juveniles (3.5 [+ or -] 0.3 g) of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei were grown during 40 days with no water exchanges, no food addition and four initial densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 g [m.sup.-3], corresponding to between 8 and 32 shrimp [m.sup.-2]), to determine growth rates, which could be achieved using the periphyton growing on artificial substrates as the only food source. The experimental culture units were 12 polyethylene 1 [m.sup.3] cylindrical tanks with 4.8 [m.sup.2] of total submerged surface (bottom and walls), provided with 7.2 [m.sup.2] of artificial substrate (Aquamats[TM]). There were no significant differences in the ammonia and nitrite concentrations determined in the four treatments (0.17-0.19 and 0.10-0.11 mg [L.sup.-1], respectively), which remained below the respective levels of concern for shrimp cultures. Mean survival was similar, and ranged from close to 91 to 97%, whereas there were significant differences in mean individual weight, which ranged from 11.9-10.6 g shrimp-1 for the two low initial densities (25 y 50 g [m.sup.-3]), to 8.3-7.7 g [shrimp.sup.-1] for the other treatments. However, because of the high survival and of the higher initial density, the best biomass yield was with 100 g [m.sup.-3]. The final nitrogen contents of sediment and water were lower than the initial values, and between 36 and 60% of the difference was converted into shrimp biomass. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0718-560X 0718-560X |
DOI: | 10.3856/vol40-issue2-fulltext-19 |