Ultrasound-guided interventions with augmented reality in situ visualisation: a proof-of-mechanism phantom study
Background Ultrasound (US) images are currently displayed on monitors, and their understanding needs good orientation skills. Direct overlay of US images onto the according anatomy is possible with augmented reality (AR) technologies. Our purpose was to explore the performance of US-guided needle pl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European Radiology Experimental 2020-02, Vol.4 (1), p.7-7, Article 7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Ultrasound (US) images are currently displayed on monitors, and their understanding needs good orientation skills. Direct overlay of US images onto the according anatomy is possible with augmented reality (AR) technologies. Our purpose was to explore the performance of US-guided needle placement with and without AR
in situ
US viewing.
Methods
Three untrained operators and two experienced radiologists performed 200 US-guided punctures: 100 with and 100 without AR
in situ
US. The punctures were performed in two different phantoms, a leg phantom with soft tissue lesions and a vessel phantom. Time to puncture and number of needle passes were recorded for each puncture. Data are reported as median [range] according to their non-normal distribution.
Results
AR
in situ
US resulted in reduced time (median [range], 13 s [3–101]
versus
14 s [3–220]) and number of needle passes (median [range], 1 [1–4]
versus
1 [1–8]) compared to the conventional technique. The initial gap in performance of untrained
versus
experienced operators with the conventional US (time, 21.5 s [3–220]
versus
10.5 s [3–94] and needle passes 1 [1–8]
versus
1 [1, 2]) was reduced to 12.5 s [3–101]
versus
13 s [3–100] and 1 [1–4]
versus
1 [1–4] when using AR
in situ
US, respectively.
Conclusion
AR
in situ
US could be a potential breakthrough in US applications by simplifying operator’s spatial orientation and reducing experience-based differences in performance of US-guided interventions. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary phantom results. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2509-9280 2509-9280 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s41747-019-0129-y |