Ondansetron compared with doxylamine and pyridoxine for treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy
Background: Nausea and vomiting affects up to 80% of the pregnant women population and are the third leading causes of maternal hospitalization during pregnancy. Many pregnant females, and even some healthcare professionals, dread using antiemetic drugs due to a false beliefof their teratogenicrisk....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of medical arts 2020-07, Vol.2 (3), p.611-618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Nausea and vomiting affects up to 80% of the pregnant women population and are the third leading causes of maternal hospitalization during pregnancy. Many pregnant females, and even some healthcare professionals, dread using antiemetic drugs due to a false beliefof their teratogenicrisk. Aim of the work:This study aimed to evaluate ondansetron to a combination of doxylamine and pyridoxine in controlling pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting. Patients and Methods:This randomized controlled trial included 156 pregnant women, at 16 weeks of gestation, with mild-to-moderate nausea and vomiting. Meanwhile, women with severe symptoms indicating admission, those already on anti-emetics, and those who wouldn’t be able to show up for follow-up visits were excluded. Seventy-eight patients received intravenous injection of ondansetron [Zofran] at a dose of 8 mg once daily for 5 days, whereas the other 78 patients received oral pyridoxine at a dose of 25 mg plus doxylamine at a dose of 12.5 mg [Diclegis] twice daily for 5 days. Each patient was subjected to full history taking, complete clinical examination and investigations. Results: Women on Ondansetron reported better alleviation of nausea compared to those receiving pyridoxine and doxylamine [96.2% vs. 52.6%, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2682-3780 2636-4174 2682-3780 |
DOI: | 10.21608/ijma.2020.26371.1111 |