Comparison of NaOH and NaOCl on-line chemical enhanced backwash on membrane fouling of high flux membrane bioreactor treating sewage

•Comparison of on-line NaOH and NaOCL-based chemical backwash for fouling reduction.•NaOH backwash increased the run-time by 45%.•NaOCl backwash increased the run-time by 61%.•NaOCl was significantly more effective than NaOH.•Chemically-enhanced backwash has no effect on pollutant removal efficienci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical engineering journal advances 2023-05, Vol.14, p.100500, Article 100500
Hauptverfasser: Zeeshan, Muhammad, Fida, Sadia, Ruhl, Aki Sebastian, Egwu, Uchenna, Kondal, Gaurav, Tabraiz, Shamas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Comparison of on-line NaOH and NaOCL-based chemical backwash for fouling reduction.•NaOH backwash increased the run-time by 45%.•NaOCl backwash increased the run-time by 61%.•NaOCl was significantly more effective than NaOH.•Chemically-enhanced backwash has no effect on pollutant removal efficiencies of MBR. Different physio-chemical and biological methods have been applied to reduce membrane fouling and to maintain the flux of membrane bioreactor (MBR). Periodic chemically enhanced backwash (CEB) has been recently developed and displayed good performance to recover the membrane permeability. However, the comparative effect of on-line CEB (using NaOCl and NaOH) on fouling mitigation and the effluent quality of MBR was poorly known. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in membrane resistance, membrane fouling and the effluent quality with and without CEB in MBR to reveal the effect of different NaOCl and NaOH concentrations. Lab-scale MBR treating sewage at high flux were operated for 8 min continuously at a flux of 20 L/(m2.h) followed by a backwash duration of 30 s. In reference MBR permeate (without chemical) was used as a backwash solution. The study found that MBR with CEB has higher operational time and lower fouling rates than reference MBR. Overall, backwash with NaOH increased the run-time by 29% – 45% compared to the control MBR, and backwash with NaOCl increased run-time from 34% to 61% compared to the control MBR. NaOCl was significantly more effective by 7% – 28% compared to NaOH in fouling reduction at different concentrations. CEB has no significant (p > 0.05) effect on the removal efficiencies of different pollutants. The chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies varied between 82 and 84%. The removals of total kjeldahl nitrogen (50 – 54%) and total phosphorus (45 – 52%) were lower due to the short solids and hydraulic retention time. This study highlights the potential of periodic CEB and concentrations of chemicals on MBR fouling and provides insights into potential approaches for mitigating this issue in MBR systems. [Display omitted]
ISSN:2666-8211
2666-8211
DOI:10.1016/j.ceja.2023.100500