Effects of active exergames on physical performance in older people: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis

This overview assessed the available body of published peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the effects of active exergames compared with active/passive control on physical performance outcomes in older people. The methodological quality and certainty of evidence were assess...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in public health 2024-04, Vol.12, p.1250299-1250299
Hauptverfasser: Hernandez-Martinez, Jordan, Ramos-Espinoza, Francisco, Muñoz-Vásquez, Cristopher, Guzman-Muñoz, Eduardo, Herrera-Valenzuela, Tomas, Branco, Braulio Henrique Magnani, Castillo-Cerda, Maria, Valdés-Badilla, Pablo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This overview assessed the available body of published peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the effects of active exergames compared with active/passive control on physical performance outcomes in older people. The methodological quality and certainty of evidence were assessed using PRISMA, AMSTAR 2, and GRADE. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (code: CRD42023391694). The main outcomes indicate that 4,477 records, five systematic reviews, and 10 meta-analyses were included. The AMSTAR-2 reported six meta-analyses with high methodological quality, four moderate quality, two systematic reviews with low quality, and three very-low quality. Meta-analysis was performed on balance using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) tests, on cardiorespiratory fitness using the 6-min walk test, and on upper and lower limbs muscle strength using the handgrip strength, knee extension, and 30-s chair stand tests. Significant differences in favor of the active exergames groups concerning active/passive groups were reported in BBS (SMD = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.12-1.58; I = 96%;  = 0.02), TUG (SMD = 1.44; 95% CI = 0.71-2.16; I = 97%;  
ISSN:2296-2565
2296-2565
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1250299