Application Specific Reconfigurable Processor for Eyeblink Detection from Dual-Channel EOG Signal
The electrooculogram (EOG) is one of the most significant signals carrying eye movement information, such as blinks and saccades. There are many human–computer interface (HCI) applications based on eye blinks. For example, the detection of eye blinks can be useful for paralyzed people in controlling...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of low power electronics and applications 2023-11, Vol.13 (4), p.61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The electrooculogram (EOG) is one of the most significant signals carrying eye movement information, such as blinks and saccades. There are many human–computer interface (HCI) applications based on eye blinks. For example, the detection of eye blinks can be useful for paralyzed people in controlling wheelchairs. Eye blink features from EOG signals can be useful in drowsiness detection. In some applications of electroencephalograms (EEGs), eye blinks are considered noise. The accurate detection of eye blinks can help achieve denoised EEG signals. In this paper, we aimed to design an application-specific reconfigurable binary EOG signal processor to classify blinks and saccades. This work used dual-channel EOG signals containing horizontal and vertical EOG signals. At first, the EOG signals were preprocessed, and then, by extracting only two features, the root mean square (RMS) and standard deviation (STD), blink and saccades were classified. In the classification stage, 97.5% accuracy was obtained using a support vector machine (SVM) at the simulation level. Further, we implemented the system on Xilinx Zynq-7000 FPGAs by hardware/software co-design. The processing was entirely carried out using a hybrid serial–parallel technique for low-power hardware optimization. The overall hardware accuracy for detecting blinks was 95%. The on-chip power consumption for this design was 0.8 watts, whereas the dynamic power was 0.684 watts (86%), and the static power was 0.116 watts (14%). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2079-9268 2079-9268 |
DOI: | 10.3390/jlpea13040061 |