Novel Volumetric Sub-region Segmentation in Brain Tumors

A novel deep learning based model called Multi-Planar Spatial Convolutional Neural Network (MPS-CNN) is proposed for effective, automated segmentation of different sub-regions . peritumoral edema ( ), necrotic core ( ), enhancing and non-enhancing tumor core ( / ), from multi-modal MR images of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in computational neuroscience 2020-01, Vol.14, p.3-3
Hauptverfasser: Banerjee, Subhashis, Mitra, Sushmita
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A novel deep learning based model called Multi-Planar Spatial Convolutional Neural Network (MPS-CNN) is proposed for effective, automated segmentation of different sub-regions . peritumoral edema ( ), necrotic core ( ), enhancing and non-enhancing tumor core ( / ), from multi-modal MR images of the brain. An encoder-decoder type CNN model is designed for pixel-wise segmentation of the tumor along three anatomical planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal) at the slice level. These are then combined, by incorporating a consensus fusion strategy with a fully connected Conditional Random Field (CRF) based post-refinement, to produce the final volumetric segmentation of the tumor and its constituent sub-regions. Concepts, such as spatial-pooling and unpooling are used to preserve the spatial locations of the edge pixels, for reducing segmentation error around the boundaries. A new aggregated loss function is also developed for effectively handling data imbalance. The MPS-CNN is trained and validated on the recent Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) 2018 dataset. The Dice scores obtained for the validation set for whole tumor ( : / + + ), tumor core ( : / + ), and enhancing tumor ( ) are 0.90216, 0.87247, and 0.82445. The proposed MPS-CNN is found to perform the best (based on leaderboard scores) for and segmentation tasks, in terms of both the quantitative measures (viz. Dice and Hausdorff). In case of the segmentation it also achieved the second highest accuracy, with a score which was only 1% less than that of the best performing method.
ISSN:1662-5188
1662-5188
DOI:10.3389/fncom.2020.00003