Are coups good for democracy? A response to Miller (2016)
This article responds to “Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy?” (Miller MK (2016) Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy? Research and Politics 3(4): ) We make clear to readers that Miller (2016) re-reports findings that we originally reported in the Appendix to our original article. We then...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research & politics 2017-04, Vol.4 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This article responds to “Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy?” (Miller MK (2016) Reanalysis: Are coups good for democracy? Research and Politics 3(4): ) We make clear to readers that Miller (2016) re-reports findings that we originally reported in the Appendix to our original article. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different estimators and re-state Miller’s main point with a visual presentation of how regime-case and country fixed effects estimators differ in this application. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2053-1680 2053-1680 |
DOI: | 10.1177/2053168017707355 |