Argus II retinal prosthesis for retinitis pigmentosa in the Middle East: The 2015 Pan-American Association of Ophthalmology Gradle Lecture

Background To describe the outcomes of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) who received the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System. Methods This retrospective, interventional case series evaluated 10 consecutive patients who received the Argus II retinal implant and underwent visual function tests w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Retina and Vitreous 2021-10, Vol.7 (1), p.1-65, Article 65
Hauptverfasser: Arevalo, J. Fernando, Al Rashaed, Saba, Alhamad, Tariq A., Al Kahtani, Eman, Al-Dhibi, Hassan A., Mura, Marco, Nowilaty, Sawsan, Al-Zahrani, Yahya A., Kozak, Igor, Al-Sulaiman, Sulaiman, Al-Abdullah, Abdulelah, Al-Bar, Ahmad, Al Dhafiri, Yousef, Al Qahtani, Abdullah, Al Rubaie, Khalid, Al Shahrani, Saeed, Al Shehri, Maha, Al Ahmadi, Badr, Al Hadlaq, Abdulaziz, Al Harbi, Majed, Al Oreany, Abdulaziz, Fernando Arevalo, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To describe the outcomes of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) who received the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System. Methods This retrospective, interventional case series evaluated 10 consecutive patients who received the Argus II retinal implant and underwent visual function tests with the system on and system off. The main outcome measures were safety (the number, seriousness, and relatedness of adverse events), and visual function measured by computer-based objective tests, including square localization (SL) and direction of motion (DOM). Secondary measures included functional vision performance, including orientation and mobility (O&M) tasks. Results There were no intraoperative complications and all prostheses remained implanted at the end of follow up. The mean patient age was 41.3 years; mean duration of the implant in vivo was 2.1 years. One patient had a suture exposure over the coil suture tab and over the inferior case suture tab at 2 years postoperatively, which was managed successfully. One patient developed mild vitreous hemorrhage that resolved spontaneously. One patient developed high intraocular pressure postoperatively due to a tight scleral band (SB) that was managed successfully. Patients performed significantly better with the Argus II system on than off on all tasks. Conclusion Patients who received the Argus II had a safety profile out to 4 years post-implantation that was markedly better than that observed in the pre-approval phase of the Argus II. In this population of RP patients, the Argus II retinal prosthesis provided useful visual function over several years that likely translates into improved quality of life. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00407602. Keywords: Retinal prosthesis, Argus II, Retinitis pigmentosa, Functional vision, Blindness
ISSN:2056-9920
2056-9920
DOI:10.1186/s40942-021-00324-6