A simple new screening tool for diagnosing imported schistosomiasis

We sought to test the sensitivity and feasibility of a Schistosoma infection screening process consisting of a scored patient consultation questionnaire and a serological diagnostic test. Prospective cross-sectional study. We collected from Schistosoma-exposed individuals a 14-point check list of cl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health in practice (Oxford, England) England), 2022-06, Vol.3, p.100245-100245, Article 100245
Hauptverfasser: Roure, Silvia, Pérez-Quílez, Olga, Vallès, Xavier, Valerio, Lluís, Fernández-Rivas, Gemma, Rivaya, Belén, López-Muñoz, Israel, Soldevila, Laura, Villanova, Xavier, Paredes, Roger, Pedro-Botet, Maria-Lluïsa, Videla, Sebastián, Clotet, Bonaventura
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We sought to test the sensitivity and feasibility of a Schistosoma infection screening process consisting of a scored patient consultation questionnaire and a serological diagnostic test. Prospective cross-sectional study. We collected from Schistosoma-exposed individuals a 14-point check list of clinical and laboratory data related to Schistosoma infection, alongside a serological test to detect Schistosoma spp infection. A check list score was created and compared with the risk of infection and clinical recovery through an agreement analysis. Two-hundred and fifty individuals were enrolled, of whom 220 (88%) were male and 30 (12%) female. The median age was 39 (range 18–78). One hundred-fifty (60%, 95% CI 54.9%–65.1%) had a check-list score ≥2. Serology test results were positive for 142 (56.8%, 95% CI 51.6%–62%). Chronic complications compatible with long-term Schistosoma infection were detected in 29 out of these 142 (20.4%, 95% CI 13.8%–27%).,. The median score value was 3, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve against serology results was 0.85 and the estimated intercept check-list questionnaire score value was 1.72 (95%, CI: 1.3–2.2). Participants with a positive serological test had a substantially higher check-list score (Cohen's kappa coefficient: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.54–0.70). Ninety four percent patients empirically treated showed a subsequent improvement in clinical and laboratory parameters. A two-component process consisting of a scored patient consultation questionnaire followed by serological assay can be a suitable strategy for screening populations at high risk of schistosomiasis infection.
ISSN:2666-5352
2666-5352
DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100245