The prevalence of occupational exposure to noise: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury
•WHO and ILO are developing joint estimates of work-related burden of disease and injury.•This paper synthesizes evidence on prevalence of occupational noise exposure.•65 studies were included (157,370 participants, 54 countries, six WHO regions).•The prevalence of occupational noise exposure in wor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environment international 2021-09, Vol.154, p.106380, Article 106380 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •WHO and ILO are developing joint estimates of work-related burden of disease and injury.•This paper synthesizes evidence on prevalence of occupational noise exposure.•65 studies were included (157,370 participants, 54 countries, six WHO regions).•The prevalence of occupational noise exposure in workers was 0.17.
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) are developing joint estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury (WHO/ILO Joint Estimates), with contributions from a large network of individual experts. Evidence from mechanistic and human data suggests that occupational exposure to noise may cause cardiovascular disease. In this paper, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of occupational exposure to noise for estimating (if feasible) the number of deaths and disability-adjusted life years from cardiovascular disease that are attributable to exposure to this risk factor, for the development of the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates.
We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse estimates of the prevalence of occupational exposure to noise.
We searched electronic academic databases for potentially relevant records from published and unpublished studies, including Ovid Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and CISDOC. We also searched electronic grey literature databases, Internet search engines, and organizational websites; hand-searched reference list of previous systematic reviews and included study records; and consulted additional experts.
We included working-age (≥15 years) workers in the formal and informal economies in any WHO Member and/or ILO member State, but excluded children ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0160-4120 1873-6750 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106380 |