6.2 Large Artery Stiffness Assessment with Arteriograph Device

Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Carotid stiffness (CS), directly measured from echo tracking is correlated with PWV and has been associated with CV risk. Arteriograph is a new n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Artery research 2010-12, Vol.4 (4), p.149-150
Hauptverfasser: Alivon, M., Ong, K. T., Khettab, H., Yanes, S., Pruny, J. F., Bozec, E., Empana, J., Pannier, B., Laurent, S., Beaussier, H., Boutouyrie, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Carotid stiffness (CS), directly measured from echo tracking is correlated with PWV and has been associated with CV risk. Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis and provides an aortic stiffness index (ASI). Aim To compare CS with echotracking to ASI with arteriograph and define their determinants and discrepancies in a large unselected middle age population. Methods CS was assessed by echotracking system (ArtLab ® ) and central pulse pressure by calibrated distension waveforms, ASI by Arteriograph. R-squared Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R 2 ) between the methods was calculated. Results 682 patients were included: 68 healthy control subjects (CTL), 412 patients with “non treated risk factors” (NTRF) and 202 with “treated risk factors” (TRF). Among NTRF and CTL patients, correlation between CS and ASI were weak (R 2 = 0.019 and 0.016 respectively, p
ISSN:1872-9312
1876-4401
1876-4401
DOI:10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.179