Endovascular therapy for superior vena cava syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the obstruction of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. In contemporary practice, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for a majority of these patients. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:EClinicalMedicine 2021-07, Vol.37, p.100970-100970, Article 100970
Hauptverfasser: Azizi, Abdul Hussain, Shafi, Irfan, Zhao, Matthew, Chatterjee, Saurav, Roth, Stephanie Clare, Singh, Maninder, Lakhter, Vladimir, Bashir, Riyaz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the obstruction of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. In contemporary practice, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for a majority of these patients. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess technical success, restenosis, and recurrence of SVC syndrome following endovascular intervention. For this meta-analysis, we conducted a systematic literature review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception to April 14, 2021 for studies on ET for SVC syndrome. Studies included full-length journal articles on the use of ET among adults with SVC syndrome. Case reports or case series with fewer than 20 patients were excluded. We evaluated the endpoints of technical success rate, restenosis rate, and recurrence rates in SVC syndrome patients after endovascular stenting. The results of this study were calculated using random-effects models. We identified 6,012 reports, of which 39 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. A total of 2200 patients received ET for SVC syndrome. The weighted technical success rate was 98.8% (95% CI 98.2–99.3) with low heterogeneity (I2=17.4%, p = 0.185), restenosis rate was 10.5% (95% CI 8.4–12.6) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=53.5%, p
ISSN:2589-5370
2589-5370
DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100970