The clinical significance of intraoperative lavage fluid culture during pancreaticoduodenectomy on organ/space surgical site infection

Organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) are common after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). There is limited research on the clinical impact of intraoperative lavage fluid contamination in patients undergoing PD. One hundred five patients who underwent PD between August 2022 and July 2023 were retrospe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2024-11, Vol.14 (1), p.28760-8, Article 28760
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Yifei, Sheng, Jianjie, Lu, Chenglin, Cheng, Hao, Li, Gang, Mao, Liang, Chen, Chuang, Qiu, Yudong, Liu, Chang, Fu, Xu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) are common after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). There is limited research on the clinical impact of intraoperative lavage fluid contamination in patients undergoing PD. One hundred five patients who underwent PD between August 2022 and July 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. The intraoperative bile and peritoneal lavage were collected for bacterial culture. Postoperative drainage bacterial cultures were performed every 2–3 days thereafter until drains were all removed. The bacteria isolated from intraoperative lavage fluid, intraoperative bile, and postoperative drainage fluid were examined in detail. The risk factors associated with positive intraoperative lavage fluid culture were analyzed through both univariate and multivariate analyses. Organ/space SSI occurred in 59(56.2%) of the 105 patients. The positivity rates of cultures in intraoperative lavage fluid, intraoperative bile, and postoperative drainage fluid were found to be 41.0%, 67.6%, and 84.8%, respectively. Patients with positive intraoperative lavage fluid culture had a significantly higher occurrence of organ/space SSI compared to the negative group (69.0% vs. 29.4%, P  
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-80245-0