Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Melasma is a chronic pigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat due to its recurrent nature. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemical peels and laser treatments in reducing pigmentation and associated risks like post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). To compare chem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cosmetic medicine 2024-12, Vol.8 (2), p.81-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Melasma is a chronic pigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat due to its recurrent nature. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemical peels and laser treatments in reducing pigmentation and associated risks like post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). To compare chemical peels and laser treatments for melasma, focusing on their effectiveness in reducing pigmentation severity (Melasma Area and Severity Index) and assessing risks like PIH. We analyzed 15 randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of chemical peels (e.g., glycolic acid, salicylic acid) and laser treatments (e.g., Q-switched Nd, fractional lasers). Outcomes included melasma severity reduction, PIH incidence, and patient satisfaction. Data were synthesized using standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and forest and funnel plots were used to evaluate efficacy and publication bias. Lasers showed higher efficacy in reducing melasma severity (SMD=0.82, 95% CI [0.60, 1.04], p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2508-8831 2586-0585 |
DOI: | 10.25056/JCM.2024.8.2.81 |