Effective dose estimation for oncological and neurological PET/CT procedures
Background The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the patient effective dose (ED) for different PET/CT procedures performed with a variety of PET radiopharmaceutical compounds. PET/CT studies of 210 patients were reviewed including Torso ( n = 123), Whole body (WB) ( n = 36), Head a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | EJNMMI research 2017-04, Vol.7 (1), p.37-37, Article 37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the patient effective dose (ED) for different PET/CT procedures performed with a variety of PET radiopharmaceutical compounds.
PET/CT studies of 210 patients were reviewed including Torso (
n
= 123), Whole body (WB) (
n
= 36), Head and Neck Tumor (HNT) (
n
= 10), and Brain (
n
= 41) protocols with
18
FDG (
n
= 170),
11
C-CHOL (
n
= 10),
18
FDOPA (
n
= 10),
11
C-MET (
n
= 10), and
18
F-florbetapir (
n
= 10). ED was calculated using conversion factors applied to the radiotracer activity and to the CT dose-length product.
Results
Total ED (mean ± SD) for Torso-
11
C-CHOL, Torso-
18
FDG, WB-
18
FDG, and HNT-
18
FDG protocols were 13.5 ± 2.2, 16.5 ± 4.5, 20.0 ± 5.6, and 15.4 ± 2.8 mSv, respectively, where CT represented 77, 62, 69, and 63% of the protocol ED, respectively. For
18
FDG,
18
FDOPA,
11
C-MET, and
18
F-florbetapir brain PET/CT studies, ED values (mean ± SD) were 6.4 ± 0.6, 4.6 ± 0.4, 5.2 ± 0.5, and 9.1 ± 0.4 mSv, respectively, and the corresponding CT contributions were 11, 14, 23, and 26%, respectively. In
18
FDG PET/CT, variations in scan length and arm position produced significant differences in CT ED (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2191-219X 2191-219X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13550-017-0272-5 |