Evaluation of in-room volumetric imaging doses for image-guided radiotherapy: A multi-institutional study
Aims: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Materials and Methods: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical physics 2023-04, Vol.48 (2), p.189-194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aims: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Materials and Methods: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography (CT) scanners (Varian, Elekta, Accuray Inc., and BrainLAB) from seven institutions were investigated in this study. The weighted cone-beam dose index (CBDIw) was calculated for head and pelvic protocols using a 100 mm pencil chamber under the conditions used in actual clinical practice at each institution. Cone-beam CT image noise was evaluated using polymethylmethacrylate head and body phantoms with diameters of 16 and 32 cm, respectively. Results: For head and pelvic protocols, CBDIw values ranged from 0.94-6.59 and 1.47-20.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 9.3-34.0 and 26.9-97.4 HU, respectively. The SD values tended to increase with decreasing imaging dose (r = −0.33 and −0.61 for the head and pelvic protocols, respectively). Conclusions: Among the nine machines, the imaging dose for high imaging dose institutions was approximately 20 mGy to the pelvic phantom, and there was a 14-fold difference in dose compared with the other institutions. These results suggest the need to establish DRLs for IGRT to guide clinical decision-making. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0971-6203 1998-3913 |
DOI: | 10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22 |