A comprehensive numerical analysis of heat and mass transfer phenomenons during cavitation sono-process

The present study treats the effects of mass transport, heat transfer and chemical reactions heat on the bubble dynamics by spanning a range of ambient bubble radii. The thermodynamic behavior of the acoustic bubble was shown for three wave frequencies, 355, 515 and 1000 kHz. The used acoustic ampli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasonics sonochemistry 2021-05, Vol.73, p.105498-105498, Article 105498
Hauptverfasser: Dehane, Aissa, Merouani, Slimane, Hamdaoui, Oualid, Alghyamah, Abdulaziz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The present study treats the effects of mass transport, heat transfer and chemical reactions heat on the bubble dynamics by spanning a range of ambient bubble radii. The thermodynamic behavior of the acoustic bubble was shown for three wave frequencies, 355, 515 and 1000 kHz. The used acoustic amplitude ranges from 1 to 3 atm. It has been demonstrated that the ambient bubble radius, R0, of the maximal response (i.e., maximal bubble temperature and pressure, Tmax and Pmax) is shifted toward lower values if the acoustic amplitude (at fixed frequency) or the ultrasonic frequency (at fixed amplitude) are increased. The range of the ambient bubble radius narrows as the ultrasonic frequency increases. Heat exchange at the bubble interface was found to be the most important mechanism within the bubble internal energy balance for acoustic amplitudes lower than 2.5 and 3 atm for ultrasonic frequencies of 355 and 515 kHz, respectively. For acoustic amplitudes greater or equal to 2.5 and 3 atm, corresponding to 355 and 515 kHz, respectively, mass transport mechanism (i.e., evaporation and condensation of water vapor) becomes dominant compared to the other mechanisms. At 1000 kHz, the mechanism of heat transfer persists to be dominant for all the used acoustic amplitudes (from 1 to 3 atm). Practically, all the above observations were maintained for bubbles at and around the optimum bubble radius, whereas no significant impact of the three energetic mechanisms was observed for bubbles of too lower and too higher values of R0 (limits of the investigated ranges of R0).
ISSN:1350-4177
1873-2828
DOI:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105498