The Solar Magnetic Hump, Heliopause, and the Very Local Interstellar Medium

The magnetic hump was observed from 2020.4 to ∼2022 by Burlaga et al. who offered the hypothesis that it originated at the Sun during the declining phase of the solar cycle. Voyager 1 observed intermittency of 1 hr increments of the magnetic field from 2013 through 2019, as well as in the magnetic h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astrophysical journal. Letters 2024-08, Vol.971 (1), p.L17
Hauptverfasser: Burlaga, L. F., Park, J., Berdichevsky, D. B., Jian, L. K., Szabo, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The magnetic hump was observed from 2020.4 to ∼2022 by Burlaga et al. who offered the hypothesis that it originated at the Sun during the declining phase of the solar cycle. Voyager 1 observed intermittency of 1 hr increments of the magnetic field from 2013 through 2019, as well as in the magnetic hump that began at the jump pf2 at 2020.4 and ended at ∼2022. Throughout this interval, the intermittency in the components of B and the magnitude B was described by the Tsallis distribution ( q -Gaussian distribution). The q -Gaussian distributions have been observed throughout the solar wind and heliosheath. However, there was little or no intermittency in the 1 hr increments of the magnetic field observed by Voyager 1 from ∼2022.0 through day 270, 2023. During this interval Voyager 1 observed intermittency with a Gaussian distribution, which is associated with Boltzmann–Gibbs statistics. The boundary between these two regions, at ∼2022.0, coincides with the heliopause predicted by Fisk & Gloeckler. Alternatively, the Voyager 1 observations might be a solar cycle effect.
ISSN:2041-8205
2041-8213
DOI:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6397