Clinical characteristics and antibody response to Omicron variants among solid carcinoma patients in China on the 2022.12-2023.4 wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

China experienced a surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variants after adjusting its zero-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) policy. Although infections with Omicron variants are generally less severe than infections with previous SARS-CoV-2 variants, the c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in immunology 2024-11, Vol.15, p.1476186
Hauptverfasser: Dai, Rongrong, Peng, Weiyu, Xu, Nani, Qin, Pan, Ding, Linling, Hua, Qianhui, Jiang, Jianmin, He, Fang, Zhang, Hangjie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:China experienced a surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variants after adjusting its zero-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) policy. Although infections with Omicron variants are generally less severe than infections with previous SARS-CoV-2 variants, the clinical characteristics, persistent symptoms, and antibody responses in solid carcinoma patients (SCPs) with COVID-19 during the Omicron wave are unclear. We conducted a cross-sectional study in April 2023, recruiting healthy controls (HCs) from the community and SCPs from Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. Serum samples were collected, and a questionnaire was used to assess SARS-CoV-2 infection status, including demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, and "long COVID" symptoms. Humoral immune responses were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) targeting immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD; Omicron BA.4/5) protein and cell culture-based neutralization assays against Omicron variants (BA.4/5, BF.7, XBB.1.5, and EG.5). In total, 298 SCPs and 258 HCs were enrolled. Self-reported COVID-19 case rates were significantly lower in SCPs than in HCs (78.5% vs. 93.8%, P
ISSN:1664-3224
1664-3224
DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1476186