Shining a little light on peer review debates

[...]no one from industry had direct access to the data, the statistical work, nor exclusive editing of the paper. The reason is that these articles may not be counted in the denominator of sourced articles that count for the impact factor of a journal. [...]they are sort of ‘risk-free’ for a journal for the impact factor, and the contents can be more varied in subject matter. Most risk calculators were developed based upon common clinical variables, while incorporation of MRI came later—a balance of increased discrimination at the added cost of MRI examination, which is highly variable worldwide. Jakobsen et al. 6 performed a patient-reported outcome measures study from a Danish population undergoing surgery for penile cancer.