Expropriation of real property as a collateral for an usurious loan

Expropriation of real property as a collateral for a loan agreement was in practice used to exploit the debtor's coercive position or to mislead the debtor. Certainly, the real goal of the debtor was not to divest themselves of their assets or their only house or flat, but merely to obtain a lo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nieruchomości 2022-12, Vol.IV (IV), p.39-58
1. Verfasser: Warchoł, Marcin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Expropriation of real property as a collateral for a loan agreement was in practice used to exploit the debtor's coercive position or to mislead the debtor. Certainly, the real goal of the debtor was not to divest themselves of their assets or their only house or flat, but merely to obtain a loan. However, the enormous costs of the loan, over and above the interest only, deceitfully concealed from the debtor at the time of entering into a loan agreement, made it simply impossible to repay the loan and resulted in the loss of the debtor's house or flat. This huge social problem would not have transpired if not for the jurisprudence of courts of law or decisions of notaries or court en-forcement officers who often accepted non-equivalence of considerations of both the parties to a contract. Therefore, in 2020, the lawmaker rightly introduced a law whereby a greater part of such agreements is invalid. Furthermore, the so-called Usurious Loans Act of 2022 will eliminate abuses in the loan market by introducing, inter alia, a precise limit on non-interest costs and supervision to be exercised by the Polish Financial Supervision Commission (KNF).
ISSN:2657-8247
2719-8030
DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0016.1265