A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation

Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. To validate the conductive pressure (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2023-07, Vol.27 (1), p.273-273, Article 273
Hauptverfasser: Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur, Moncomble, Elsa, Lesimple, Arnaud, Delamaire, Flora, Louis, Bruno, Mekontso Dessap, Armand, Mercat, Alain, Richard, Jean-Christophe, Beloncle, François, Carteaux, Guillaume
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. To validate the conductive pressure (P ) method, which compare the P -defined on the airway pressure waveform as the difference between the airway pressure level at which an abrupt change in slope occurs at the beginning of insufflation and PEEP-to resistive pressure for AOP detection and measurement, and to compare its respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance to the standard low-flow insufflation method. The proof-of-concept of the P method was assessed on mechanical (lung simulator) and physiological (cadavers) bench models. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in 213 patients, using the standard low-flow insufflation method as a reference. In 45 patients, the respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance of the P method was compared with the standard low-flow method. Bench assessments validated the P method proof-of-concept. Sensitivity and specificity of the P method for AOP detection were 93% and 91%, respectively. AOP obtained by P and standard low-flow methods strongly correlated (r = 0.84, p 
ISSN:1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
1366-609X
DOI:10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0