Is elective neck dissection justified in cT2N0M0 oral cavity cancer defined according to the AJCC eighth edition staging system?

Background The current NCCN guidelines recommend considering elective neck dissection (END) for early‐stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with a depth of invasion (DOI) exceeding 3 mm. However, this DOI threshold, determined by evaluating the occult lymph node metastatic rate, lacks ro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer medicine (Malden, MA) MA), 2024-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e6894-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Tsung‐Ming, Terng, Shyuang‐Der, Lee, Li‐Yu, Lee, Shu‐Ru, Ng, Shu‐Hang, Kang, Chung‐Jan, Lin, Jin‐Ching, Chien, Chih‐Yen, Hua, Chun‐Hung, Wang, Cheng Ping, Chen, Wen‐Cheng, Tsai, Yao‐Te, Tsai, Chi‐Ying, Lin, Chien‐Yu, Fan, Kang‐Hsing, Wang, Hung‐Ming, Hsieh, Chia‐Hsun, Yeh, Chih‐Hua, Lin, Chih‐Hung, Tsao, Chung‐Kan, Cheng, Nai‐Ming, Fang, Tuan‐Jen, Huang, Shiang‐Fu, Lee, Li‐Ang, Fang, Ku‐Hao, Wang, Yu‐Chien, Lin, Wan‐Ni, Hsin, Li‐Jen, Yen, Tzu‐Chen, Wen, Yu‐Wen, Liao, Chun‐Ta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The current NCCN guidelines recommend considering elective neck dissection (END) for early‐stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with a depth of invasion (DOI) exceeding 3 mm. However, this DOI threshold, determined by evaluating the occult lymph node metastatic rate, lacks robust supporting evidence regarding its impact on patient outcomes. In this nationwide study, we sought to explore the specific indications for END in patients diagnosed with OCSCC at stage cT2N0M0, as defined by the AJCC Eighth Edition staging criteria. Methods We examined 4723 patients with cT2N0M0 OCSCC, of which 3744 underwent END and 979 were monitored through neck observation (NO). Results Patients who underwent END had better 5‐year outcomes compared to those in the NO group. The END group had higher rates of neck control (95% vs. 84%, p 
ISSN:2045-7634
2045-7634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.6894