Impact of second autologous stem‐cell transplantation at relapsed multiple myeloma: A French multicentric real‐life study

A second autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT2) is considered for relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM) patients showing prolonged response after a first ASCT. However, given breakthrough treatments like anti‐CD38 and immunotherapy, its role remains debated. We conducted a real‐life study in 10 Fren...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HemaSphere 2024-08, Vol.8 (8), p.e106-n/a
Hauptverfasser: André, Axel, Montes, Lydia, Roos‐Weil, Damien, Frenzel, Laurent, Vignon, Marguerite, Chalopin, Thomas, Debureaux, Pierre‐Edouard, Talbot, Alexis, Farge, Agathe, Jardin, Fabrice, Belhadj, Karim, Royer, Bruno, Marolleau, Jean‐Pierre, Arnulf, Bertrand, Morel, Pierre, Harel, Stéphanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A second autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT2) is considered for relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM) patients showing prolonged response after a first ASCT. However, given breakthrough treatments like anti‐CD38 and immunotherapy, its role remains debated. We conducted a real‐life study in 10 French centers (1996–2017) involving 267 RMM patients receiving ASCT2. The median age was 61 years, with 49% females. Most patients received melphalan 200 mg/m² before ASCT2, with low early mortality (1%). Very good partial response or better (VGPR+) rate post ASCT2 was 78%. Post ASCT2, 48% received consolidation therapy and 40% maintenance therapy. Median event‐free survival (EFS) after ASCT2 was 2.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3–2.8), and 2‐year EFS estimate was 63% (95% CI: 57–70). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 years (95% CI: 5.9–NA), and 2‐year OS estimate was 92% (95% CI: 88–95). Multivariate analysis revealed that VGPR+ status and maintenance therapy post ASCT2 were associated with better EFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3–0.9, p = 0.012 and HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3–0.6, p 
ISSN:2572-9241
2572-9241
DOI:10.1002/hem3.106