Association between self-reported motivation to quit smoking with effectiveness of smoking cessation intervention among patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland

•Smokers with low motivation to quit usually are not offered intensive counselling.•When offered to all smokers, most with low motivation to quit accepted counselling.•Proactive counselling was associated with higher quit rates among less motivated smokers. Guidelines recommend brief smoking cessati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive medicine reports 2021-12, Vol.24, p.101583-101583, Article 101583
Hauptverfasser: Worni-Schudel, Inge, Tzalis, Vasilis, Jakob, Julian, Tal, Kali, Gilgien-Dénéréaz, Lauriane, Gencer, Baris, Matter, Christian M., Lüscher, Thomas Felix, Windecker, Stephan, Mach, François, Humair, Jean-Paul, Rodondi, Nicolas, Nanchen, David, Auer, Reto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Smokers with low motivation to quit usually are not offered intensive counselling.•When offered to all smokers, most with low motivation to quit accepted counselling.•Proactive counselling was associated with higher quit rates among less motivated smokers. Guidelines recommend brief smoking cessation interventions for hospitalized smokers reporting low motivation-to-quit. However, an intensive smoking cessation intervention may improve smoking cessation for these smokers. We conducted a secondary analysis of a pre-post interventional study that tested the efficacy of a proactive approach systematically offering intensive smoking cessation intervention to all hospitalized smokers with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared to a reactive approach offering it only to smokers willing to quit. We analyzed data from one study site in Switzerland, which recorded motivation-to-quit smoking at study inclusion between 08.2009 and 02.2012. The primary outcome was smoking cessation at 1- and 5-year. We tested for interaction by participant’s motivation-to-quit score (low vs. high motivation), and calculated multivariable adjusted risk ratios (RR), stratified by motivation score. We obtained motivation scores for 230 smokers. Follow-up was 94% (217/230) at 1-year and 68% (156/230) at 5-year. Among participants with low motivation to quit, 19% of smokers in the reactive phase had quit at 1 year compared to 50% of smokers in the proactive phase (multivariable adjusted RR = 2.85, 95%CI:0.91–8.91). Among highly motivated smokers, rates did not differ between phases: 48% vs. 49% (multivariable adjusted RR = 1.02, 95%CI:0.75–1.39, p-value for interaction between motivation-to-quit categories = 0.10). At 5-year follow-up, the point estimates were similar. While our study has limitations inherent to the study design and sample size, we found that a proactive approach to offer systematic smoking cessation counseling for smokers with ACS reporting low motivation to quit was associated with higher smoking cessation rates at 1 year.
ISSN:2211-3355
2211-3355
DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101583