A non-randomized risk-adjusted comparison of lenalidomide + R-CHOP versus R-CHOP for MYC-rearranged DLBCL patients

Patients with MYC rearranged ( MYC -R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis. Previously, we demonstrated in a single-arm phase II trial (HOVON-130) that addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP (R2CHOP) is well-tolerated and yields similar complete metabolic remission rates as more...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood cancer journal (New York) 2023-05, Vol.13 (1), p.85-85, Article 85
Hauptverfasser: de Jonge, A. Vera, van Werkhoven, Erik, Dinmohamed, Avinash G., Nijland, Marcel, Zwinderman, Aeilko H., Bossuyt, Patrick M., Veldhuis, Martine S., Rutten, Emma G. G. M., Mous, Rogier, Vermaat, Joost S. P., Sandberg, Yorick, de Jongh, Eva, Bilgin, Yavuz M., Boersma, Rinske, Koene, Harry, Kersten, Marie José, de Jong, Daphne, Chamuleau, Martine E. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patients with MYC rearranged ( MYC -R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis. Previously, we demonstrated in a single-arm phase II trial (HOVON-130) that addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP (R2CHOP) is well-tolerated and yields similar complete metabolic remission rates as more intensive chemotherapy regimens in literature. In parallel with this single-arm interventional trial, a prospective observational screening cohort (HOVON-900) was open in which we identified all newly diagnosed MYC -R DLBCL patients in the Netherlands. Eligible patients from the observational cohort that were not included in the interventional trial served as control group in the present risk-adjusted comparison. R2CHOP treated patients from the interventional trial ( n  = 77) were younger than patients in the R-CHOP control cohort ( n  = 56) (median age 63 versus 70 years, p  = 0.018) and they were more likely to have a lower WHO performance score ( p  = 0.013). We adjusted for differences at baseline using 1:1 matching, multivariable analysis, and weighting using the propensity score to reduce treatment-selection bias. These analyses consistently showed improved outcome after R2CHOP with HRs of 0.53, 0.51, and 0.59, respectively, for OS, and 0.53, 0.59, and 0.60 for PFS. Thus, this non-randomized risk-adjusted comparison supports R2CHOP as an additional treatment option for MYC -R DLBCL patients.
ISSN:2044-5385
2044-5385
DOI:10.1038/s41408-023-00854-2