A European Competence Framework for Industrial Pharmacy Practice in Biotechnology

The PHAR-IN (" ") looked at whether there is a difference in how industrial employees and academics rank competences for practice in the biotechnological industry. A small expert panel consisting of the authors of this paper produced a biotechnology competence framework by drawing up an in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacy 2015-07, Vol.3 (3), p.101-128
Hauptverfasser: Atkinson, Jeffrey, Crowley, Pat, De Paepe, Kristien, Gennery, Brian, Koster, Andries, Martini, Luigi, Moffat, Vivien, Nicholson, Jane, Pauwels, Gunther, Ronsisvalle, Giuseppe, Sousa, Vitor, van Schravendijk, Chris, Wilson, Keith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The PHAR-IN (" ") looked at whether there is a difference in how industrial employees and academics rank competences for practice in the biotechnological industry. A small expert panel consisting of the authors of this paper produced a biotechnology competence framework by drawing up an initial list of competences then ranking them in importance using a three-stage Delphi process. The framework was next evaluated and validated by a large expert panel of academics ( 37) and industrial employees ( = 154). Results show that priorities for industrial employees and academics were similar. The competences for biotechnology practice that received the highest scores were mainly in: "Research and Development", '"Upstream" and "Downstream" Processing', "Product development and formulation", "Aseptic processing", "Analytical methodology", "Product stability", and "Regulation". The main area of disagreement was in the category "Ethics and drug safety" where academics ranked competences higher than did industrial employees.
ISSN:2226-4787
2226-4787
DOI:10.3390/pharmacy3030101