Safety, immunogenicity and protective effectiveness of heterologous boost with a recombinant COVID-19 vaccine (Sf9 cells) in adult recipients of inactivated vaccines

Vaccines have proven effective in protecting populations against COVID-19, including the recombinant COVID-19 vaccine (Sf9 cells), the first approved recombinant protein vaccine in China. In this positive-controlled trial with 85 adult participants (Sf9 cells group: n  = 44; CoronaVac group: n  = 41...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Signal transduction and targeted therapy 2024-02, Vol.9 (1), p.41-41, Article 41
Hauptverfasser: Luo, Wenxin, Gan, Jiadi, Luo, Zhu, Li, Shuangqing, Wang, Zhoufeng, Wu, Jiaxuan, Zhang, Huohuo, Xian, Jinghong, Cheng, Ruixin, Tang, Xiumei, Liu, Yi, Yang, Ling, Mou, Qianqian, Zhang, Xue, Chen, Yi, Wang, Weiwen, Wang, Yantong, Bai, Lin, Wei, Xuan, Zhang, Rui, Yang, Lan, Chen, Yaxin, Yang, Li, Li, Yalun, Liu, Dan, Li, Weimin, Chen, Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Vaccines have proven effective in protecting populations against COVID-19, including the recombinant COVID-19 vaccine (Sf9 cells), the first approved recombinant protein vaccine in China. In this positive-controlled trial with 85 adult participants (Sf9 cells group: n  = 44; CoronaVac group: n  = 41), we evaluated the safety, immunogenicity, and protective effectiveness of a heterologous boost with the Sf9 cells vaccine in adults who had been vaccinated with the inactivated vaccine, and found a post-booster adverse events rate of 20.45% in the Sf9 cells group and 31.71% in the CoronaVac group ( p  = 0.279), within 28 days after booster injection. Neither group reported any severe adverse events. Following the Sf9 cells vaccine booster, the geometric mean titer (GMT) of binding antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of prototype SARS-CoV-2 on day 28 post-booster was significantly higher than that induced by the CoronaVac vaccine booster (100,683.37 vs. 9,451.69, p  
ISSN:2059-3635
2095-9907
2059-3635
DOI:10.1038/s41392-024-01751-1