Ground strains induced by the 2022 Hunga-Tonga volcanic eruption, observed by a 1500-m laser strainmeter at Kamioka, Japan
In this study, we detected the horizontal ground strains induced by the atmospheric Lamb wave emitted from the 2022 eruption of the Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai undersea volcano, at an underground observatory in Kamioka, Japan. The observed strains were in the range of 10 - 11 – 10 - 10 and were measured pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth, planets, and space planets, and space, 2023-12, Vol.75 (1), p.98-14, Article 98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study, we detected the horizontal ground strains induced by the atmospheric Lamb wave emitted from the 2022 eruption of the Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai undersea volcano, at an underground observatory in Kamioka, Japan. The observed strains were in the range of
10
-
11
–
10
-
10
and were measured precisely using a 1500-m laser strainmeter with a high resolution in the order of
10
-
12
. This was one of the first observations of a Lamb wave using a laser strainmeter. The strainmeter was constructed in a tunnel of the KAGRA gravitational-wave telescope. Our observations demonstrate that strain and atmospheric pressure were clearly correlated, resulting in a regression coefficient of
-
2.3
-
3.7
×
10
-
10
strain/hPa. This finding was compared with the responses under regular pressure conditions and the estimations obtained using the local deformation and traveling wave models. The observed coefficients for the Lamb wave exhibited smaller magnitudes than those observed under regular conditions and take values between that of the two theoretical models. These results reflect the intermediate scale of the pressure distribution of the Lamb wave between the assumptions of the simple models. The strain variations were also found to have started earlier than the corresponding pressure changes at the observation site with characteristic time lags ranging from 25 to 155 s. In addition, several aspects related to the mechanism that created the time lags are discussed.
Graphical Abstract |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1880-5981 1343-8832 1880-5981 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s40623-023-01857-w |