The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Male Strength Athletes Who Use Non-prescribed Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids
One sub-population potentially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic are strength athletes who use anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS). We examined links between disruption in AAS use and training due to the pandemic and mental health outcomes in this population, hypothesising: (a) the pandemic would be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in psychiatry 2021-03, Vol.12, p.636706-636706 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One sub-population potentially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic are strength athletes who use anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS). We examined links between disruption in AAS use and training due to the pandemic and mental health outcomes in this population, hypothesising: (a) the pandemic would be linked with reduced training and AAS use; and (b) athletes perceiving greater impact on their training and AAS use would report increases in detrimental mental health outcomes.
Male strength athletes using AAS (
= 237) from 42 countries completed an online questionnaire in May 2020. A sub-sample (
= 90) from 20 countries participated again 4 months later. The questionnaire assessed pre-pandemic and current AAS use and training, alongside several mental health outcomes.
At Time 1, most participants perceived an impact of the pandemic on AAS use (91.1%) and/or training (57.8%). Dependent
-tests demonstrated significant reductions in training frequency (
= 7.78;
< 0.001) and AAS dose (
= 6.44;
< 0.001) compared to pre-pandemic. Linear regression showed the impact of the pandemic on training was a significant positive predictor of excessive body checking (
= 0.35) and mood swings (
= 0.26), and AAS dose was a significant positive predictor of anxiety (
= 0.67), insomnia (
= 0.52), mood swings (
= 0.37). At Time 2, fewer participants perceived an impact of the pandemic on AAS use (29.9%) and/or training (66.7%) than at Time 1. Training frequency (
= 3.02;
< 0.01) and AAS dose (
= 2.11;
< 0.05) were depressed in comparison to pre-pandemic. However, AAS dose had increased compared to Time 1 (
= 2.11;
< 0.05). Linear regression showed the impact of the pandemic on training/AAS use did not significantly predict any mental-health outcomes. However, AAS dose was a significant negative predictor of depressive thoughts (
= -0.83) and mood swings (
= -2.65).
Our findings showed impact of the pandemic on the training and AAS use, reflected in reduced training frequency and AAS dose. However, whilst we detected some short-term consequential effects on mental health, these did not appear to be long-lasting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1664-0640 1664-0640 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.636706 |