"They Were Noble Automatons Who Knew Not What They Did:" Volition in Jaynes' The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind

An important question in consciousness research concerns its origins. In Julian Jaynes' book, Mind, he suggests that consciousness arose rather recently in human history, sometime between the composition of and . Although Jaynes' work as a theory of consciousness has achieved a great deal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in psychology 2021-12, Vol.12, p.811295-811295
1. Verfasser: Moore, James W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An important question in consciousness research concerns its origins. In Julian Jaynes' book, Mind, he suggests that consciousness arose rather recently in human history, sometime between the composition of and . Although Jaynes' work as a theory of consciousness has achieved a great deal of attention (and indeed criticism), what has not been widely noted is the prominent role of volition in his theory. In this article I hope to draw attention to these overlooked aspects of his theory, in particular the fact that volition is central to Jaynes' definition of consciousness and that it is changes in the nature of volitional experience that mark, for Jaynes, the emergence of consciousness.
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811295